Comparative Analysis of Celebrity Behavior in the US and Iranian Elections Case Study: US Election 2016 and Iranian Election 2017

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Social Communication Sciences Department; Social Sciences Faculty; University of Tehran

2 Department of Social Communication Sciences; Social Sciences Faculty; University of Tehran; Tehran; Iran

10.22059/wsps.2026.405847.1563
Abstract
These days, celebrities play an extensive role in people’s lives. They have entered cultural, social, economic—and also political—spheres and influence their audiences. One area that, over recent decades, has been affected by and entangled with celebrities’ involvement is elections in various countries. By endorsing a like-minded candidate, celebrities call on their audiences to support that person and thus advocate for them.



This study, using a comparative approach and Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis method, examines how celebrities expressed support during Iran’s 2017 election and the United States’ 2016 election at the candidates’ campaign rallies. To that end, three celebrities from each country were selected for analysis: Beyoncé, Katy Perry, and Demi Lovato from the U.S., and Sahar Dolatshahi, Baran Kosari, and Leili Rashidi from Iran. The findings indicate that in both countries, celebrity discourse is shaped by the political, cultural, and social context. Iranian celebrities tended to present themselves as aligned with the people and sharing their vote, criticizing existing structures, the previous government, and obstacles to civil liberties, with a stronger emphasis on reform. American celebrities, by contrast, focused more on the values of freedom and on welfare issues.

Keywords

Subjects


Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 11 August 2026

  • Receive Date 15 November 2025
  • Revise Date 20 July 2026
  • Accept Date 11 August 2026