University of Tehran
Published jointly with Iranian World Studies AssociationJournal of World Sociopolitical Studies2588-31194420201001A Medley of Voices Representing Dialogic Democracy, Autocracy or Violence in Afghanistan: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Soltanzade’s Brazen Bulls6336647908310.22059/wsps.2020.309515.1175ENZohrehRaminAssistant Professor of English Language and Literature, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranAmirhosseinEffatianPhD Candidate of English Language and Literature, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranJournal Article20200606Afghanistan is a country besieged by years of instability and unrest as a result of the weak governments that have seized power, especially after King Zahir. Mohammad Asef Soltanzade’s “<em>Brazen Bulls</em>” is the story of the tragedy that befalls a country similar to Afghanistan. The story is an allegory of the atrocities committed against the civilians and the civilians who resort to extreme forms of violence to counteract the government and occupied forces’ measures. The novel has propensities for dialogical analysis as a result of the voices that represent different discourses in the present-day Afghanistan. This paper is an attempt to link the text of the novel to the discursive and social practices that gave rise to the emergence of such novels. It aims to illustrate the way in which literary products could engender discourses that are necessary for forcing effective changes in hegemonic discourse over time. The methodology used to fulfill the purposes of the paper and generate discussion is the critical discourse analysis endorsed by Norman Fairclough.https://wsps.ut.ac.ir/article_79083_f64a91363c0097cb5fbea7592c8abe96.pdfUniversity of Tehran
Published jointly with Iranian World Studies AssociationJournal of World Sociopolitical Studies2588-31194420201001Bilateral Trade Potentials in Iran-Russia Relations: A Case Study of Food Trade6657068238410.22059/wsps.2021.319781.1217ENFereshtehAbnikiM.A. in Russian Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranNahidPourrostamiAssistant Professor of East Asian and Oceania Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranTohidAsadiPhD Candidate of American Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran0000-0003-3974-1503Journal Article20200509Signing a preferential trade agreement between Iran and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) has created a suitable context for the expansion of trade interactions between the countries of this region. With respect to this context, this paper examines food trade potentials between Iran and Russia as two neighbors with significant economies. Product codes are chosen from the 21 categories of the integrated tariff system based on the global definition of food. Data analysis is based on four trade criteria including the Allen cosine measure, the Revealed Comparative Advantage measure, the simple estimate of trade potential measure, and the Drysdale index over the years 2001–2017. These indices illustrate that Iran and Russia have high trade capacities for some items in certain food groups, and that they can facilitate the process of economic integration through reinforcing regional interactions and intra-region trade expansion, while safeguarding national interests and improving national security. The paper concludes that Iran’s food exports to Russia in a particular set of commodity codes enjoy the potential of expansion due to structural similarities between the countries’ food exports, the increasing trend of Iran’s food export potential to Russia, the increasing advantage of these commodity codes in Iran’s export to the world, and the increasing trade expansion opportunities from Iran to Russia.https://wsps.ut.ac.ir/article_82384_0af651a580bdf9869730396f503bfa5f.pdfUniversity of Tehran
Published jointly with Iranian World Studies AssociationJournal of World Sociopolitical Studies2588-31194420201001Anomie and Peace: A Cross-National Study7077318294910.22059/wsps.2021.326411.1229ENMahdiKarimiAssistant Professor of Asian Cultural Documentation Center, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, IranTohidJafari-KoshkiAssistant Professor of Statistics and Epidemiology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IranJournal Article20200621In today’s world, which is rife with civil wars, terrorist activities, and different forms of violence, peace has become a complex concept, affected by various social, economic, cultural, political and psychological factors. One of the states of the society, which may pave the way for conflict or other forms of violence is anomie. Anomie, as a societal state, in which there is a threat of violence, war or terrorist activities, provides a rich area of study to develop deeper insights into conflictive contexts. After developing a theoretical framework and using formerly developed measurements and sequence results, we conduct two studies to further investigate the relation between anomie and peace/conflict. Results indicate that internal peace is associated with the breakdown in leadership and social fabric (Study 1A). Therefore, dysregulated and disintegrated societies as the result of breakdown in leadership and social fabric respectively, pave the way for direct and indirect violence. In addition, our results illustrate that anomie has an important role in predicting the contexts where conflict exist (Study 1B). Findings indicate that anomie data can be useful to forecast the contexts in which there is a potential conflict. They also highlight the importance of anomie in being peaceful or conflictive in societies.https://wsps.ut.ac.ir/article_82949_9a000f97ea994f798640851568e1d020.pdfUniversity of Tehran
Published jointly with Iranian World Studies AssociationJournal of World Sociopolitical Studies2588-31194420201001The Construction of Islamic Feminism in Iran: A Critical Discourse Analysis on Zanan and Zanan-e-Emruz Magazines7337718466010.22059/wsps.2021.326604.1232ENZohrehNosrat KharazmiAssistant Professor of American Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranZinatMotahariPhD Candidate of Political Sociology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, IranHannanehNosrat KharazmiM.A. in Islamic Jurisprudence, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, IranJournal Article20200103Islamic feminism is one of the movements that developed in reaction to the revival of political Islam in post-Islamic Revolution Iran (1979). The present study attempts to seize the major nodal points around which this discourse has been formed. Using Margot Badran’s theory of the convergence of secular and Islamic feminisms, this study also explains the tenets of Islamic feminism in a country where filling the gap between the secular and the Islamic is rejected. It focuses on the analytical articles published by <em>Zanan</em> and <em>Zanan-e-Emruz</em> magazines as two prominent platforms for Islamic feminists to highlight their answers to the modern concerns of Iranian women. The results indicate that the major discursive nodes include: a) women’s Ijtihad and the re-interpretation of the holy texts with a women-friendly outlook, b) human equality exempt from sexuality, c) demands for a conventional notion of justice, and d) recognition of women’s socio-political capacities vis-à-vis their family identities.<br /> https://wsps.ut.ac.ir/article_84660_8ab90d60e9db75c18c6f34ff3b1d758b.pdfUniversity of Tehran
Published jointly with Iranian World Studies AssociationJournal of World Sociopolitical Studies2588-31194420201001History and Political Geography of Central Europe: Explaining the Rise of Euroscepticism and Nativism in Visegrád 4 countries7738088294610.22059/wsps.2021.322264.1209ENSeyed NaderNourbakhshPh.D. Candidate of Political Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran0000-0002-4034-4372Seyed AbbasAhmadiAssistant Professor of Political Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranQiuomarsYazdanpanah DeroAssociate Professor of Political Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranAbdolrezaFaraji RadAssociate Professor of Political Geography, Islamic Azad University
(Science and Research Branch), Tehran, IranJournal Article20200418The rise of the far right is one of the significant challenges facing European countries; the growing Eurosceptic and nativist attitudes in Central Europe have resulted in transforming regional alliances according to anti-immigration concerns. Despite the fact that the Visegrád 4 group, (Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia), was founded in the early 1990s with the aim of detaching itself from the legacy of communism and pushing towards the Western liberal democracy, it has recently become a base to oppose EU and promote nativism and illiberal democracy. Adopting a descriptive-analytical approach, this paper reviews the rise of nativism and Euroscepticism with a historical perspective, through an examination of the political geography of Central Europe. Findings reveal that the influxes of refugees to Europe and increasing xenophobia, along with cultural concerns, specially about Muslims, have been the driving force behind the growth of the far-right parties. Additionally, the geopolitical situation of these countries and the external borders of the European Union have an important role in turning the refugee crisis into a driving factor of Euroscepticism.https://wsps.ut.ac.ir/article_82946_18037003cd3c1e8e47678108dd1f4578.pdfUniversity of Tehran
Published jointly with Iranian World Studies AssociationJournal of World Sociopolitical Studies2588-31194420201001Orientalist Framing of Post-Revolutionary Iran: A Study of Iranian-American Memoirs8098408505810.22059/wsps.2021.332132.1243ENElhamKadkhodaeeAssistant Professor of American Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranZeinabGhasemi TariAssistant Professor of American Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranJournal Article20191010Since the Islamic Revolution of 1979 and the deposition of the pro-American Pahlavi regime in Iran, an interest in the country as a mythical, complex, and conflict-ridden place has magnified among the American public. Exilic Iranian memoirs began to emerge after the 1979 Iranian Revolution and surged after September 11, 2001, claiming to provide an authentic depiction and explanation of the Iranian society and politics and the ways in which it relates to the West and Western interests. The present article aims to analyze the ways in which post-Revolutionary Iran has been framed through memoirs written by Iranian-Americans. Through a framing analysis of fifteen selected memoirs on Iran, the article identifies and presents six main frames in the analyzed texts based on Edward Said’s Orientalism. The paper concludes that instead of providing a more or less objective depiction that acknowledges the diversity and heterogeneity of the Iranian society and politics, the selected texts reflect the existence of an industry of memoirists that produce content depicting Iran in an orientalist way. Such an approach further inhibits any meaningful understanding and rectification of the existing misconceptions.<strong> </strong>https://wsps.ut.ac.ir/article_85058_13b9721873c63a161d7670cf200e64e9.pdfUniversity of Tehran
Published jointly with Iranian World Studies AssociationJournal of World Sociopolitical Studies2588-31194420201001Iran Rising: The Survival and Future of the Islamic Republic, by Amin Saikal. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2019. 326 pp. ISBN: 97806911754788418448511810.22059/wsps.2021.334669.1250ENJaniceWebsterPhD Candidate of Iranian Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranJournal Article20200415<span style="font-family: 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 12pt;">Distinguished Professor Amin Saikal is a prominent Australian Middle Eastern politics scholar and media commentator, so his views on the Islamic Republic of Iran reach a wide audience. His view of Iran is one of an outsider, which entails certain limitations in terms of lived experience and cultural knowledge, but he is a native Persian speaker as well as an experienced researcher with first-hand experience of Iran. Saikal’s writing style and choice of content bridges his academic specialisation and extensive media and political commentary experience. <em>Iran Rising</em> thus has less theoretically sophisticated aims and a wider scope than a purely academic work, but seeks to offer a credible and well-informed portrait of the last four decades of Iranian politics, especially foreign policy.</span>https://wsps.ut.ac.ir/article_85118_f61d020f6bf3a789a353c867356e7d99.pdf