<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran
Published jointly with Iranian World Studies Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-3119</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Israel Advocacy in the Academic Field: The Case of Terrorism Studies</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>409</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>444</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">74963</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/wsps.2020.286488.1111</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Elham</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kadkhodaee</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of West Asian Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>03</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Research on the special relationship between the United States and Israel has usually been focused on strategic aspects, whilst fewer scholars have focused on non-material dimensions of the relationship. In addition, the existing research is mostly confined to the political and decision-making realms, with very few excursions into the academic arena. The current article aims to fill this lacuna through the study of pro-Israel academic discourse in America, focusing on the specific case of the field of terrorism studies. Critical discourse analysis of pro-Israel academic texts in this field is carried out to reveal the discourse, themes and arguments used to build this ideational pillar of the special relationship and move towards a common identity between the US and Israel. The common ingroup identity model (CIIM) is used to describe the process through which a common identity is constructed. The article concludes that defining the Self, defining the Other, and defining the norms are the three main strategies employed in the studied texts to achieve this goal.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">academic discourse</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">common identity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Israel</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Israel advocates</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">special relationship</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">terrorism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">United States</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://wsps.ut.ac.ir/article_74963_28242fcff9089545b697da25eae0617f.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
