<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran
Published jointly with Iranian World Studies Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-3119</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Ontological (In)security and Brexit: ‘Islandness’ Identity and an Emotional Choice</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>37</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">102458</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/wsps.2025.389614.1497</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sam</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mohammadpour</LastName>
<Affiliation>Postdoctoral Researcher of British Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-8790-9262</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Saeidabadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of European Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-3950-7939</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>29</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Over the past century, the United Kingdom has transitioned through various international roles, from a global superpower during its imperial era to a key partner within the European Union. Brexit, however, has triggered what many scholars describe as a foreign policy ‘identity crisis’. This paper challenges this conventional narrative by applying an ontological security framework to investigate how EU membership and the European integration process themselves represented an identity crisis for many Britons. The analysis explores the emotional motives behind Brexit by examining how Euroscepticism, combined with a desire to reclaim Britain’s ‘islandness’ identity, contributed to the decision to leave the European Union. Employing a thematic narrative analysis, the research examines the interaction between identity-based motivations and broader political and historical contexts to reveal new understandings of the multifaceted factors driving Brexit and its enduring effects. By investigating ontological security concepts such as existential threat, continuity disruption, and the restoration of narrative identity, the paper argues that EU integration itself, rather than Brexit, was perceived by many as the principal threat to Britain’s biographical narrative and national identity. These insights contribute to understanding how identity-based anxieties influence major political decisions and carry implications for policymaking and EU–UK relations moving forward.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">European Union</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Euroscepticism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">existential anxiety</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Narrative Identity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">United Kingdom</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Brexit</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://wsps.ut.ac.ir/article_102458_7ee4949d0135b0aa871733e23c568189.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
